Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Finn Tearney Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Tearney analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Finn Tearney Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 1 Tearney
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.51% of points on their second serve, while Tearney has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tearney has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tearney has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 58.57% of matches played (W/L 41/ 29), with Tearney winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 115/ 90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Tearney has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 136/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.93% of matches (W/L 33/ 23), where as Tearney has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 1 times and Tearney being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Tearney winning 2. The last match between Krueger and Tearney was at the China F9, 04-06-2016, Final, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Tearney have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Tearney 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Tearney 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.66 while Tearney has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tearney has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tearney has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
189
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
356
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
53% (406-359)
Career Total W/L
60% (148-99)
63% (26-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$4,555
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Mitchell Krueger vs Finn Tearney For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Krueger VS Tearney
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Finn Tearney |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:35:30 | 0:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (40/62) | 73% (32/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (23/40) | 75% (24/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (9/22) | 67% (8/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (12/44) | 48% (30/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Finn Tearney
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Finn Tearney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (26/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (60/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (526/462) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (16/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 194 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:32 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 336.88 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (2006/3122) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1405/2006) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (586/1116) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (128/302) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1310/3267) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (25/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (26/41) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (16/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (26/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (26/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Mitchell Krueger
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
118)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
1-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Yuta Shimizu
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Aidan Mayo
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Liam Draxl
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Mitchell Krueger
51%
(
56 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
79 of
119)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
52%
(
28 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(3) 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Mitchell Krueger
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Filip Misolic
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Finn Tearney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Anton Shepp
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Finn Tearney
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Ching Ho Sunny Yue
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Finn Tearney
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Finn Tearney
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
17
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Rishab Agarwal
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Gueydan
Player
Finn Tearney
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Tearney Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Krueger are available here and Tearney photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
